Poll: Speed Up?
Get More Speed (Intel CPU)
Nothing (Intel CPU)
Get More Speed (AMD CPU)
Nothing (AMD CPU)
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 19 Votes - 4.21 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dolphin 5186 build (SSE3,SSE4) with Intel C++ compiler for comparison purpose
01-18-2010, 11:14 AM (This post was last modified: 03-11-2010 09:06 AM by spellforce.)
Post: #1
Dolphin 5186 build (SSE3,SSE4) with Intel C++ compiler for comparison purpose
for people who curious about performance using another compiler that's not vc++


http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php use program like cpuz to check what ever max SSE you have to get more benefit from build

New
** different setting each time when compile so speed maybe also different.

(D3D always optimize while OGL can't do optimize)

http://www.mediafire.com/?iioimkwnmcg 5186 win32 SSE3 with multi path
http://www.mediafire.com/?whk2mjzmbhn 5186 x64 SSE3 with multi path

--------------------------
http://www.mediafire.com/?hmwqztzky4m 5182 Win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?jen5zykttzm 5182 Win32 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?5gwt25jojm2 5182 Win32 SSE4.2
http://www.mediafire.com/?id1mzoz53y3 5182 X64 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?nznbrn4hjtk 5182 X64 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?gmemjuhmny1 5182 X64 SSE4.2

-------------------------------------

http://www.mediafire.com/?ojzzykzlb20 5170 SSE3 with all optimization path (SSE4.2,SSE4.1,SSSE3,SSE3)
http://www.mediafire.com/?nqzwjmmozzz 5170 SSE3 with all optimization path (SSE4.2,SSE4.1,SSSE3,SSE3)

Compile with multi-path so it will select the highest path for your cpu automatically.These maybe not good as CPU specific build but I just compile it to replace normal SSE3 build.

------------------------
http://www.mediafire.com/?ozydmgeknjy 5160 SSE3 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?mm3ymbmdowl 5160 SSE3 x64
http://www.mediafire.com/?nhzkztmgnze 5160 SSE4.1 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?mhmc1o12myy 5160 SSE4.1 x64
http://www.mediafire.com/?hqhmiqzziyz 5160 SSE4.2 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?wzio2rmni0o 5160 SSE4.2 x64

------------------
http://www.mediafire.com/?dmg5nez4kyy 5142 SSE3 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?2yzhgl1zjdr 5142 SSE3 x64
http://www.mediafire.com/?zm4yytmy0ym 5142 SSE4.1 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?jtwzjz1yazz 5142 SSE4.1 x64
http://www.mediafire.com/?zjghfk2tvmt 5142 SSE4.2 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?zwikkqtehz1 5142 SSE4.2 x64
--------------

http://www.mediafire.com/?kjedmymryfy 5136 win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?dyemd2j3nie 5136 x64 SSE3

http://www.mediafire.com/?oiyzqj4zimv 5135 Win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?ntjmzvcrddj 5135 Win32 SSE 4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?2lmiy1tz130 5135 Win32 SSE4.2
http://www.mediafire.com/?tidjzxamymm 5135 x64 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?mo0czvyyzmy 5135 x64 SSE 4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?yhr4jdm1inq 5135 x64 SSE 4.2
-------------

http://www.mediafire.com/?0tj2y0gwy2m 5116 win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?xyzeaj2uzme 5116 x64 SSE3
---------------
http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/sou...ail?r=5038 ** fix/improve safe texture cache from 5034 a bit but still may cause slowdown **
disable 'safe texture cache' if you feel slowdown

http://www.mediafire.com/?kzy1cywj4ij 5115 win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?dgdawljzxjm 5115 win32 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?r1zahdhdk1m 5115 win32 SSE4.2
http://www.mediafire.com/?0wnrzjamyzj 5115 x64 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?idoyqmmmngq 5115 x64 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?hntycimnliz 5115 x64 SSE4.2

-------
http://www.mediafire.com/?dmqw2jmmc4k 5095 x64 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?u2kmmzojj2m 5095 win32 SSE3

------------


http://www.mediafire.com/?e2dn0rwjmmd 5081 win32 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?czywm4qdjyy 5081 x64 SSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?mmqv2mzehmd 5081 win32 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?ylu0njddidz 5081 x64 SSE4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?jtxmejmvmkh 5081 win32 SSE4.2
http://www.mediafire.com/?wnq0d3ct04q 5081 x64 SSE4.2

-----------------

http://www.mediafire.com/?tzdjqwyawn2 5073 SSE3 win32
http://www.mediafire.com/?wz2ilyrd2dm 5073 SSE3 x64
---------------

http://www.mediafire.com/?xm0wnxjg5zm 5062 SSE3 win32 rebuild
http://www.mediafire.com/?m2dnynj240h 5062 SSE4.1 win32 rebuild
http://www.mediafire.com/?myhdjyt21mz 5062 SSE4.2 win32 rebuild
http://www.mediafire.com/?wgtznk21uzj 5062 SSE3 x64
http://www.mediafire.com/?uicumymwmnz 5062 SSE4.1 x64 rebuild
http://www.mediafire.com/?mngkwmmdgiw 5062 SSE4.2 x64 rebuild

**can not not test sse4 don't know if I have to rebuild all because Intel use whole program optimization use normal build maybe not work with the changes**

-----------------------
http://www.mediafire.com/?0xnmygx2zzd 5053 x64 sse3
http://www.mediafire.com/?mzmkmgmz4nz 5053 x64 SSSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?nodzkmz4mmz 5053 x64 sse4.1 reupload (fix corrupted files)
http://www.mediafire.com/?zzyz0yt1hzd 5053 x64 sse4.2
http://www.mediafire.com/?ldzmizvyy0y 5053 win32 sse3
http://www.mediafire.com/?kdzfyyk0yth 5053 win32 SSSE3
http://www.mediafire.com/?iez4nym2xmm 5053 win32 sse4.1
http://www.mediafire.com/?thdm3zmnjtz 5053 win32 SSE4.2






SSE3,SSE4.2 mean you must have SSE3,SSE4.2 support to run

I build this at my company and scan it with nod32 antivirus lastest update.but for your safety maybe you have to scan it again.

My Skydrive
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 11:23 AM
Post: #2
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
I've heard that Intel compilers deliberately reduce performance on non-intel processors.
I'm using an Intel on this machine, so it should be interesting to see, I'm going to try it.

[Image: 0moyR.gif]
[Image: 971934.png]
.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 11:26 AM
Post: #3
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
so will this run better on my intel cpu?

Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bit | Intel® Pentium® Dual T3200 @ 2.00GHz | 1.9 GB RAM | Mobile Intel® 4 Series Express Chipset Family | HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T50N | Realtek High Definition Audio
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 11:37 AM
Post: #4
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
Well, can't say I notice any difference in performance, against a recent build by mamario.

Someone with an AMD processor aught to test this.

[Image: 0moyR.gif]
[Image: 971934.png]
.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 11:39 AM (This post was last modified: 01-18-2010 11:47 AM by spellforce.)
Post: #5
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
they has many function that benefits Intel cpu.but I didn't use that... (VC++ can add SSE2 instruction set but ICC can add SSE4.2)

but anyway I compile with auto parallelization so it can be benefits with something like quadcore for a few loop.


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
   

My Skydrive
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 12:03 PM
Post: #6
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
so really this isn't anything special for intel users?

oh well i'll leave this thread since it isn't

i though that since amd and nvidia users had one that intel was going to get one

oh well back to orleans

Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bit | Intel® Pentium® Dual T3200 @ 2.00GHz | 1.9 GB RAM | Mobile Intel® 4 Series Express Chipset Family | HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T50N | Realtek High Definition Audio
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 12:12 PM
Post: #7
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
if I compile for intel cpu only it maybe good for intel user I guess.

My Skydrive
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 12:48 PM
Post: #8
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
(01-18-2010 12:12 PM)spellforce Wrote:  if I compile for intel cpu only it maybe good for intel user I guess.

having a build that works/performs better for intel users would be great

hopefully you can compile one like that

Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bit | Intel® Pentium® Dual T3200 @ 2.00GHz | 1.9 GB RAM | Mobile Intel® 4 Series Express Chipset Family | HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T50N | Realtek High Definition Audio
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 02:46 PM (This post was last modified: 01-18-2010 02:50 PM by Mills.)
Post: #9
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
I was curious how ICL would fare over VC, but this build seems much slower for me. Could be the rev itself as I'm comparing against like 10-15 revs older.

Thanks for compiling for testing though.

Tested on Intel i7 860 D3D
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-18-2010, 05:39 PM (This post was last modified: 01-18-2010 05:40 PM by naroth.)
Post: #10
RE: 4873 build with Intel c++ compiler for comparison purpose
well at some parts in brawl its fast, and in others its just normal.

my average in this build is 38-39, but in older build was 35-38, i think this is a bit faster

   

   

[Image: qqw.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: